21 Comments

Nicely done, Terry. I read both fiction and non. Reading the TOC always helps with nonfiction!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Michael. Not so much with fiction!

Expand full comment

A great read (Terry, I read all the headings first, then started at the end and then read the whole thing :P)

But seriously, this was very useful. I primarily consume fiction in book form, so a lot of this doesn't really apply, especially because I want to fully absorb every minute detail from the author, but for online content and for thinking about my own Substack posts and those of others then this was solid advice, thanks!

Expand full comment

Thanks very much, Nathan. Starting from the end is a good strategy: I often read the Intro of a book and then leap straight to the concluding chapter, so I know where we're headed. Not a great strategy for fiction though!

Expand full comment

Lovely and cute (your opener :), Nathan. Thanks so for engaging here. And I so agree about fiction!

Expand full comment

Consider me engaged. (Subbed.)

Expand full comment

Lovely. Hope to hear more from you. And again, my thanks. ~Mary

Expand full comment

I mostly read fiction but I'm trying to read more nonfiction and I've been struggling to get through all sorts of dense material. Thanks for the useful tips.

Expand full comment

I’m a slow reader, but usually give an author the benefit of the doubt the first time I encounter them and will read carefully from beginning to end. The next time, I’ll adjust my reading approach if they appear prone to verbosity or dullness, or just skip them altogether.

Wit can also be used as a tool of compression; and a memorable line can make an article memorable.

For example, once you’ve read the last line of Dorothy Parker’s 300-word review of The House at Pooh Corner, you’ll remember her opinion of that book:

https://bookmarks.reviews/in-which-winnie-the-pooh-makes-dorothy-parker-throw-up/

And a publication like the Economist, even when it strays far from its remit (“economics”), usually does so with concision (600 words) and flare:

https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/01/31/the-murder-of-a-king-makes-for-a-most-jolly-day-out

And which would you rather read, T.S. Eliot’s 2000-word “Hamlet and His Problems” (memorable line: “[Hamlet] is the “Mona Lisa” of literature”), with its solitary footnote…

https://www.bartleby.com/200/sw9.html

Or Freud colleague Ernest Jones’ 17,000-word study in Hamlet’s motive, with its 125 footnotes?

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_American_Journal_of_Psychology/Volume_21/The_%C5%92dipus-complex_as_an_Explanation_of_Hamlet%27s_Mystery:_A_Study_in_Motive

Shakespeare: “Brevity is the soul of wit.”

Parker: “Brevity is the soul of lingerie.”

Expand full comment

Great links, Franhk, thank you. I always love Dorothy Parker quotes!

Expand full comment

Love, these links, Frank. Fab comment that added much to this post. Thank you. And gotta love "Brevity is the soul of lingerie" and the comparison to the Bard. ~ Mary PS. Would you like to do a guest post for me? Write me at <mltabor@me.com>.

Expand full comment

That’s a kind offer. I’m also a slow writer and have trouble keeping my own sporadic blog fed:

https://10franks.com

But I’ll let you know if I come up with something that might be good for a guest post.

Expand full comment

SUCH a valuable post! Those 'mental hooks' are so important, aren't they? We all have certain words that leap out at us anyway, such as our own name, or a location, or something pertaining to our favourite hobby or favourite subject matter - but I'd never thought of thinking ahead to what I'm hoping to discover in a text that I'm about to read. Setting up those 'mental hooks' you speak of would do exactly that job!

I'm certainly going to be working on my reading technique now! I get very, very bogged down in reading, feeling that if I've committed to read something I am obliged to read it really really properly. In fact I don't NEED to go to that level in everything I'm reading! Reading this post has been such a relief in that respect - it has opened my eyes WIDE, Terry and Mary! Thank you. ⭐️

Expand full comment

Thanks, Rebecca. The mental hooks idea definitely works. Wish I'd have thought of your examples though 😁

Expand full comment

You didn't need examples - I knew exactly what you meant! Such a great post, Terry. Thank you - I learned a great deal. 😊

Expand full comment

Lovely comment. Thank you, Rebecca.

Expand full comment

A good confirmation of my own way of reading the news as quickly as possible. Thanks!

Expand full comment

Mary, Would you like to do a guest post for me. Write me and I'll tell you how I do this. Would love to have you. xo Mary

Expand full comment

Thanks, Mary. It's always nice to receive confirmation I find 😁

Expand full comment

Most informative, thanks.

Expand full comment

Glad you found it useful, Rosy. Thanks 😁

Expand full comment